July 2018


The Statue of Liberty Ellis Island Foundation launched a crowdfunding campaign to build a new Statue of Liberty Museum on Liberty Island.

The foundation launched the "For Lady Liberty" campaign on crowdfunding website Indiegogo, seeking at least $50,000 toward funding the 26,000-square-foot museum planned to open in May 2019.

Designed by U.S. architecture firm FXCollaborative, the new museum is meant to hold more guests than the existing exhibit inside the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty.

[ads-post]

Tickets to the museum, which will become the new home of the Statue of Liberty's original torch, will be included in the price of ferry tickets purchased for Ellis Island and Liberty Island.

The foundation is offering donors a variety of perks including a tour of the museum alongside the designers, tickets to the opening gala and ribbon cutting ceremony and apparel including hats, T-shirts and watches, depending on the amount of the donation.

Donors will also have their names displayed in a digital registry, known as the Founders Star, inside the museum.

The foundation noted Joseph Pulitzer led a crowdfunding campaign to complete the statue's pedestal in 1884 in which 120,000 people donated more than $100,000.

Donors were also encouraged to contribute donations of $18.86 in honor of the year the Statue of Liberty was dedicated.

The campaign has received $12,105 from 366 backers.

Source
Source

An inflatable trampoline exploded Sunday in Britain, killing a 3-year-old girl, authorities said.

The incident occurred on Gorleston Beach in Norfolk, England. Emergency responders rushed to help the girl, who suffered serious injuries and cardiac arrest, The Guardian reported.

"Witnesses reported a large bang before the incident but we don't know at this stage what caused the trampoline to burst and that is the purpose of the investigation we will be undertaking," Norfolk police said in a statement.

Witnesses said the explosion threw the girl into the air.

[ads-post]

"Just seen the most horrific thing in my life," Kara Longshaw wrote in a Facebook post. "A bouncy castle exploded at the beach and the child on it was catapulted about 20ft into the air. Please do not allow your children on a bouncy castle in this heat."

A similar incident involving an inflatable trampoline killing a young girl occurred in 2016, which led to manslaughter convictions for two fairground workers in May.

Sunday's incident closely after the convictions of those employees prompted British MP Robert Halfon to call for a temporary ban on inflatable trampolines.

"Another horrific tragedy after the horrific tragedy in #Harlow in 2016. Clearly there needs to be a serious review into regulations around bouncy castles. Just awful," he tweeted.




Source
Source





Farmers across the Midwestern United States expect to lose billions of dollars this year if the trade war between the United States and China continues to escalate.

China has threatened $50 billion in tariffs on American exports -- including soybeans and other agricultural products -- beginning Friday. The move is retaliation for tariffs the United States imposed on China to combat "unfair practices related to the acquisition of American intellectual property and technology," President Donald Trump said. Rather than spur China to alter its trade policies, China punched back, putting the two governments in a standoff.

Midwestern farmers are in the crossfire.

"There are issues related to our trade dealings with China," said Grant Kimberley, the director of market development for the Iowa Soybean Association. "Trump's not wrong. But the stakes are pretty high here. We don't want to be the pawn."
The stakes are high because China buys roughly 30 percent of all America's soy. The proposed 25 percent tariff -- which is a tax buyers pay the government to purchase the commodity -- ensures Chinese buyers will look elsewhere.

A Purdue University study estimated soy exports to China would drop about 65 percent under such a tariff.

"That is a major disaster," said Farzad Taheripour, a professor of agricultural economics at Purdue.

If the trade dispute remains unresolved by fall harvest time, the price of American soy will fall sharply, said Taheripour, who conducted the study. Farmers could lose more than $3 billion in the first year.
An Iowa State University economist said that Iowa farmers alone could lose up to $624 million. What that looks will like on individual farms is hard to predict.

"I think I can weather this," said John Heisdorffer, an Iowa farmer. "I think I can. Farmers are used to markets going up and down, and we try and prepare for the down years. But there is no way to prepare for this. We're going to lose money on every acre of soybeans."
Heisdorffer, who is the president of the American Soybean Association, worries for young farmers with less money put aside. He also fears that farmers who rent land will not earn enough to pay their leases.

"There will be farmers who lose their rentals," he said.
Farmers who stay afloat will do what they can to prepare for a lean year. Most will put off buying new farm equipment and tractors, said Jim Fitkin, an Iowa farmer. Many will probably buy less fertilizer.

"There's not much more we can put off," Fitkin said.

That leaves them in the uncomfortable position of waiting and hoping for a swift resolution between the feuding governments. And they're not the only ones. The soy tariff will have equally profound impacts on the Chinese economy.

Taheripour's study predicts that the Chinese economy lose more than $3 billion due to the tariff. That's on top of the billions of dollars more that the United States' tariffs will cost them.

"We have good relationships with industry buyers in China," Kimberley said. "They also want this resolved quickly. They want to buy from us. We just need our governments to figure out a way to resolve this."

If a swift resolution is not achieved, America's agricultural economy will experience some fast -- and painful -- adjustments over the next few years.
With less demand, American soy production will likely drop 15 percent, Taheripour said. Farmers who stay solvent will have to find other crops to grow.

[ads-post]


Meanwhile, soy production elsewhere in the world will skyrocket to fill China's demand, Taheripour said.

Brazil, which competes with the United States in soy exports, will see a huge economic stimulus.
"Brazilian farmers will do well with this," Taheripour said.

With the extra money, Brazil is planning to build roads and invest in other infrastructure in rural areas, Taheripour said. The new infrastructure will allow that country to not only increase their soy exports, but other crops as well.

"That's going to have lots of unforeseen impacts in the future," Taheripour said. "This trade war is a big gift for Brazil."
American farmers and trade negotiators are hopeful it won't come to that.

"We just have to hope that this is dealt with quickly so we can get back to the business of feeding the world," Kimberley said. "Ultimately, nobody is going to win in a trade war that affects food."

A federal judge on Friday ruled that children do not have a fundamental right to learn how to read and write.

U.S. District Judge Stephen Murphy III's ruling came in response to a class action lawsuit filed on behalf of several Detroit-area public school students who said their schools were in such disarray -- from dilapidated buildings to classrooms with no teachers -- that the state was not only failing its duties, but violating the students' 14th Amendment rights under the due process and equal protection clauses by prohibiting them of the ability to fully participate in society. And Plaintiffs wanted the court to force the state to make reforms.

But Murphy said the 14th Amendment does not mention literacy, so the students had no right to a quality education.

"Plainly, literacy -- and the opportunity to obtain it -- is of incalculable importance," Murphy wrote in his opinion. "As Plaintiffs point out, voting, participating meaningfully in civic life, and accessing justice require some measure of literacy. Applying for a job, securing a place to live, and applying for government benefits routinely require the completion of written forms. Simply finding one's way through many aspects of ordinary life stands as an obstacle to one who cannot read. But those points do not necessarily make access to literacy a fundamental right."

Murphy cited several other Supreme Court cases where the importance of of a good or service "does not determine whether it must be regarded as fundamental."

"Under Plaintiffs' reasoning, if the State's failure to provide a good or service to a person results in a limitation of future opportunities and social stigma, the good or service must be a fundamental right," Murphy wrote. "Yet the same could presumably be said for a person who must go without a sanitary place to live, or must live in an abusive home -- and neither of those implicate a fundamental right."
Attorneys for the student and parent plaintiffs said they plan to appeal to the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, the Detroit Free Press reported.

Mark Rosenbaum, an attorney with the Public Counsel law firm in Los Angeles, said the court "got it tragically wrong when it characterized access to literacy as a privilege, instead of a right held by all children so that they may better their circumstances and meaningfully participate in our political system."

Source
Source

MKRdezign

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Powered by Blogger.
Javascript DisablePlease Enable Javascript To See All Widget